On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:57:24PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:59:11PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:36:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > When trying to split up the initialisation phase and the registration
> > > phase, one immediate problem encountered is trying to use our own i2c
> > > devices before registration with userspace (to read EDID during device
> > > discovery). drm_dp_aux in particular only offers an interface for setting
> > > up the device *after* we have exposed the connector via sysfs. In order
> > > to break the chicken-and-egg problem, export drm_dp_aux_init() to
> > > minimally prepare the i2c device for internal use before
> > > drm_connector_register().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > > index 4b088afa21b2..9b4ec65e1de6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > > @@ -791,15 +791,16 @@ static void unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *i2c, unsigned int flags)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * drm_dp_aux_register() - initialise and register aux channel
> > > + * drm_dp_aux_init() - minimally initialise an aux channel
> > > * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> > > *
> > > - * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> > > + * If you need to use the drm_dp_aux's i2c adapter prior to registering it
> > > + * with the outside world, call drm_dp_aux_init() first. You must still
> > > + * call drm_dp_aux_register() once the connector has been registered to
> > > + * allow userspace access to the auxiliary DP channel.
> > > */
> > > -int drm_dp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > > +void drm_dp_aux_init(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > > {
> > > - int ret;
> > > -
> > > mutex_init(&aux->hw_mutex);
> > >
> > > aux->ddc.algo = &drm_dp_i2c_algo;
> > > @@ -809,6 +810,21 @@ int drm_dp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> > > aux->ddc.lock_bus = lock_bus;
> > > aux->ddc.trylock_bus = trylock_bus;
> > > aux->ddc.unlock_bus = unlock_bus;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_init);
> >
> > This doesn't feel very safe to me. To me it looks like the i2c core
> > wasn't designed to have the adapter be used before i2c_add_adapter()
> > is called. I guess it might work in this case since you provide your
> > own lock vfuncs.
> >
> > I think someone should fix the i2c core to split i2c_add_adapter()
> > & co. into init and register phases. Cc:ing i2c folks...
>
> As you've seen, I sent the patches to split i2c_add_adapter() to allow for
> us to call i2c_init_adapter() here instead. It still requires the same
> basic review that this init (the same as above) is sufficient for using
> i2c_transfer().
>
> I would like to get the regression fix completed without much futher
> ado - in particular, not depending upon landing an external patch.
What regression is this?
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
