On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:44:45PM +0530, Arun Siluvery wrote: > On 03/06/2016 22:06, Chris Wilson wrote: > >As we only ever keep the first error state around, we can avoid some > >work that can be quite intrusive if we don't record the error the second > >time around. This does move the race whereby the user could discard one > >error state as the second is being captured, but that race exists in the > >current code and we hope that recapturing error state is only done for > >debugging. > > > >Note that as we discard the error state for simulated errors, igt that > >exercise error capture continue to function. > > > >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > Patch does more than what is described here, all of i915_gem_request > changes are part of this patch, accidentally squashed may be. Thanks, I spotted that as I posted it, and was able to recover the 2 patches from reflog. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
