On 02/06/16 21:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:19:48PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Just a bunch of stale kerneldocs generating warnings when
building the docs. Mostly function parameters so not very
useful but still.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Minor nit: Mostly we dont put a blank line between the title - purpose
line and the start of the @parameter list. There's also a bunch of
kerneldoc comments that don't even start with the function name. Do they
work and show up correctly in the generated output?
One more special case below
Okay respun, however I don't see that anything from i915_gem.c is
showing up in the generated index -
Documentation/output/html/genindex.html#I.
At least it is not throwing that many warnings during the build.
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
