On 27 May 2016 at 17:08, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:54:46PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 27 May 2016 at 16:36, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Nils Wallménius wrote: >> >> Hi, Chris >> >> >> >> See comment below >> >> >> >> > err_setunique: >> >> > if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) >> >> > @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: >> >> > drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); >> >> > err_free: >> >> > mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex); >> >> > - kfree(dev); >> >> > - return NULL; >> >> > + return 0; >> >> >> >> Shouldn't this return != 0? >> > >> > You saw nothing, it always said return ret! >> Chris can you please elaborate ? I believe Nils has a point here. > > I mean, "thanks for bringing that to my attention, oops it was meant to > say return ret ofc, fixed". Seems like I had a dull moment. Thanks for explaining ! -Emil _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
