There's no need to multiply the number of batches with the number of
engines as intel_require_memory() already compares against the aperture
size (count * BATCH_SIZE).
This also removes the weird assertion messages where we need
bogus amounts of RAM.
Also tune down the timeout from from 10s to 2s to speed up BAT.
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/gem_exec_gttfill.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_gttfill.c b/tests/gem_exec_gttfill.c
index 5921923..4778e4d 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_gttfill.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_gttfill.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void fillgtt(int fd, unsigned ring, int timeout)
count = size / BATCH_SIZE + 1;
igt_debug("Using %'d batches to fill %'llu aperture on %d engines\n",
count, (long long)size, nengine);
- intel_require_memory(count * nengine, BATCH_SIZE, CHECK_RAM);
+ intel_require_memory(count, BATCH_SIZE, CHECK_RAM);
memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
execbuf.buffer_count = 1;
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ igt_main
igt_fork_hang_detector(device);
igt_subtest("basic")
- fillgtt(device, 0, 10);
+ fillgtt(device, 0, 2);
for (e = intel_execution_engines; e->name; e++)
igt_subtest_f("%s", e->name)
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
