Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> In order to reduce the workload of the caller, we do not want to
> actually have to retire requests of others when checking the status of
> this object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 8439867..474c027 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3069,14 +3069,8 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> if (req == NULL)
> continue;
>
> - if (list_empty(&req->list))
> - goto retire;
> -
> - if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true)) {
> - __i915_gem_request_retire__upto(req);
> -retire:
> + if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true))
> i915_gem_object_retire__read(obj, i);
> - }
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.8.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
