On Mon, 09 May 2016, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IS_GEN(p, start, end) using inclusive ranges is fine.
>
> This is a small patch that generates a remarkable amount of object code
> reduction.
Ok.
I guess 0 is okay for start, but how about a "GEN_FOREVER" style macro
for replacing ->gen >= 5 with IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5, GEN_FOREVER)? This
would be in line with the IS_{SKL,BXT}_REVID checks.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
