Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Matt,

On 22 April 2016 at 00:16, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For a detailed explanation of this series, please see the original cover letter:
>   https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-April/091293.html
>
> This spin just incorporates the final review feedback from Maarten and
> hopefully kicks the CI system (I never got any CI test results back from v2).

For the series, with Maarten and Lyude's amendments:
Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I was seeing pretty savage underflows on eDP+DP SKL, but these have
gone away with this patchset on top of -nightly.

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux