On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM, <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > GPIO lookup tables are supposed to be zero terminated. Let's do that
> > > and avoid accidentally walking off the end.
> > >
> > > Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Fixes: 61dd2ca2d44e ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applied to drm-intel trees, thanks for patch, reviews&acks.
Do what now? How can you apply a patch for a subsystem you don't have
responsibility for? This is bound to cause merge conflicts.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
