On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 28/04/16 17:24, Chris Wilson wrote: > >With the introduction of a distinct engine->id vs the hardware id, we need > >to fix up the value we use for selecting the target engine when signaling > >a semaphore. Note that these values can be merged with engine->guc_id. > > So I broke something more with the decoupling, did not realize. I > suppose it was still worth it. This at least wasn't being used. A consolation prize: wean the guc over to a common hw_id :) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
