On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 16:53 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 08:47:54AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > We have in the history some changes on this behaviour, but > > there are many platforms out there and we don't know all panels. > > > > VBT might not be reliable but it knows the platform better than > > us usually. Or at least it should. > > So, first of all let's respect the VBT. If something bad happens > > again with one platform or another it is better to create a > > quirk than to bypass the VBT. > > > > Cc: Mihai Dontu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > index c3abae4..e65e2c3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > @@ -788,14 +788,11 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_device *dev) > > } > > > > /* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */ > > - if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) > > - /* HSW and BDW require workarounds that we don't > > implement. */ > > - dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false; > > This patch has nothing to do with respecting the VBT or not, it's > about > whether the comment that we still require w/a is valid or not. > > That's not even mentioned in the changelog. Oh you are right... Looking to the logs and HSD it seems that we still need the workaround on HSW and BDW, since HSW has no single frame update and we don't implement on BDW because it requires other 3 W/a... Maybe we should just disable PSR for the cases VBT tells only link standby is supported on HSW and BDW. > -Chris > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
