On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:29:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> amdgpu gained dev->struct_mutex usage, and that's because it's walking >> the dev->filelist list. Protect that list with it's own lock to take >> one more step towards getting rid of struct_mutex usage in drivers >> once and for all. >> >> While doing the conversion I noticed that 2 debugfs files in i915 >> completely lacked appropriate locking. Fix that up too. >> >> v2: don't forget to switch to drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked. >> >> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > Just wondering if this worth converting over. Opening/closing isn't > going to be high contention, I hope, though we can certainly write > stress cases for it! The goal for drivers to stop using the struct_mutex > as their BKL, which doesn't preclude keeping the struct_mutex around for > where it makes sense to have a single mutex rather than a multitude. > > I have some misgivings over this, but only because I think its overkill. > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I agree with Chris' sentiments. Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
