On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:29:33PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Vblank waits timing out is no a normal thing to happen, so let's inform > people when it happens. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied to drm-misc, let's see how much it blows up. We /should/ be filtering out entirely defunct vblank implementations already by checking vblank_get() ... -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c > index 7bf678ee7f81..40c7b268a9bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c > @@ -1103,6 +1103,8 @@ drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks(struct drm_device *dev, > drm_crtc_vblank_count(crtc), > msecs_to_jiffies(50)); > > + WARN(!ret, "[CRTC:%d] vblank wait timed out\n", crtc->base.id); > + > drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc); > } > } > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
