Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [ text/plain ] > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:48:13AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:14:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> The two behavioral changes here are the correct detection of the eDRAM size on >> > >> gen9 (SKL + KBL), and unconditional printing of the eLLC size. >> > >> >> > >> Cc: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > > Please see [1]. >> > > >> > > BR, >> > > Jani. >> > > >> > > >> > > [1] http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460557604-7126-3-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > I did mean to refer to the entire series >> > >> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/5663/ >> > >> > >> >> My patch is more correct as it does the proper calculation. >> > > Oh. He did it as two patches with the first claiming we can't make the > calculation... that was odd. > Yeah that is a mistake. We can't calculate with gen < 9 and thus the comment should have been modified to reflect that. -Mika > Anyway, assuming it does the right thing patches 2, and 3 are: > Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --- >> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- >> > >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c >> > >> index fbc1d21..efef724 100644 >> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c >> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c >> > >> @@ -314,8 +314,17 @@ static void intel_uncore_ellc_detect(struct drm_device *dev) >> > >> { >> > >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >> > >> >> > >> - if ((IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev) || >> > >> - INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) && >> > >> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9 && HAS_LLC(dev)) { >> > >> + u32 edramcap = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, HSW_EDRAM_PRESENT); >> > >> + if (edramcap & EDRAM_ENABLED) { >> > >> + int sets = (edramcap >> 8) & 0x3; >> > >> + int ways = (edramcap >> 5) & 0x7; >> > >> + int banks = (edramcap >> 1) & 0xf; >> > >> + >> > >> + ways = (ways + 1) * 4; >> > >> + dev_priv->ellc_size = sets * ways * banks; >> > >> + } >> > >> + } else if ((IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) && >> > >> (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, HSW_EDRAM_PRESENT) & EDRAM_ENABLED)) { >> > >> /* The docs do not explain exactly how the calculation can be >> > >> * made. It is somewhat guessable, but for now, it's always >> > >> @@ -323,8 +332,9 @@ static void intel_uncore_ellc_detect(struct drm_device *dev) >> > >> * NB: We can't write IDICR yet because we do not have gt funcs >> > >> * set up */ >> > >> dev_priv->ellc_size = 128; >> > >> - DRM_INFO("Found %zuMB of eLLC\n", dev_priv->ellc_size); >> > >> } >> > >> + >> > >> + DRM_INFO("Found %zuMB of eLLC\n", dev_priv->ellc_size); >> > >> } >> > >> >> > >> static bool >> > >> > -- >> > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
