On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:09:38 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:37:22AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:54:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > I'm not sure there's a strong one, we don't really use the class device > > > for anything, but without doing a full audit I couldn't guarantee that. > > > At first glance I don't see any problem (even the rdev_err/info/...() > > functions do not use dev_err/info/...()). The patch will be part of v6 > > (unless you want me to send it independently). > > I'd rather it didn't get sucked into this series since it seems that > it's getting delayed indefinitely - I can apply it to the regulator tree > and create a tag that can be pulled into other trees as needed if things > do get applied. Done. -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
