On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:29:37PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Only grab correct forcewake for the engine with execlists > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/5375/ > State : success > > == Summary == > > Series 5375v1 drm/i915: Only grab correct forcewake for the engine with execlists > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/5375/revisions/1/mbox/ > > Test drv_module_reload_basic: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Test gem_ctx_param_basic: > Subgroup invalid-ctx-set: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Test gem_storedw_loop: > Subgroup basic-blt: > dmesg-fail -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Subgroup basic-bsd: > skip -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Test kms_addfb_basic: > Subgroup bad-pitch-128: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Test kms_flip: > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: > incomplete -> PASS (hsw-gt2) Hmm, intriguing. I wonder if fortune holds if we send the patch again... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
