On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:31:24PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On to, 2016-03-24 at 17:03 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 04:34:01PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > > > > > > == Series Details == > > > > > > Series: kernfs: Move faulting copy_user operations outside of the mutex (rev2) > > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3722/ > > > State : warning > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Series 3722v2 kernfs: Move faulting copy_user operations outside of the mutex > > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3722/revisions/2/mbox/ > > > > > > Test pm_rpm: > > > Subgroup basic-rte: > > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2) > > This WARN is about Unclaimed access detected, which we have an open bug > for. > > > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE > > Something is notable by its absence here! > > Other tests were fine in the run. > > > > > Would someone do the honours and see if the suspend tests pass without > > lockdep WARNs on Brasweel? > > To me it seems it worked just fine. OK if I merge this (and rebase if > needed)? I was expecting to see a fair few dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw) since the purpose of this patch is to cut down on the CI noise. If they are passing without the patch, this patch is not required, right? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
