On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:50:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Move all data initialized from VBT under dev_priv->vbt. No functional >> changes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +-- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >> index ad6f69ef95d5..bf867e28731d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h >> @@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ struct intel_vbt_data { >> union child_device_config *child_dev; >> >> struct ddi_vbt_port_info ddi_port_info[I915_MAX_PORTS]; >> + struct sdvo_device_mapping sdvo_mappings[2]; >> }; >> >> enum intel_ddb_partitioning { >> @@ -1823,8 +1824,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private { >> >> /* Kernel Modesetting */ >> >> - struct sdvo_device_mapping sdvo_mappings[2]; >> - >> struct drm_crtc *plane_to_crtc_mapping[I915_MAX_PIPES]; >> struct drm_crtc *pipe_to_crtc_mapping[I915_MAX_PIPES]; >> wait_queue_head_t pending_flip_queue; >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c >> index 3af8a4a2e145..407fb7a12a49 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c >> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ parse_sdvo_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> child->slave_addr, >> (child->dvo_port == DEVICE_PORT_DVOB) ? >> "SDVOB" : "SDVOC"); >> - p_mapping = &(dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[child->dvo_port - 1]); >> + p_mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[child->dvo_port - 1]; > > Is the long-term plan that you pass around a point to dev_priv->vbt into > all the parsing functions? Could be nice step to reinforce all your work > to have vbt parsing consolidated into one place. Yes, eventually I'd like (most of) dev_priv->vbt be private to intel_bios.c and abstracted away from the rest of the driver. > Anyway, on patches 2-4: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> Thanks, pushed to drm-intel-next-queued. BR, Jani. > >> if (!p_mapping->initialized) { >> p_mapping->dvo_port = child->dvo_port; >> p_mapping->slave_addr = child->slave_addr; >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c >> index fae64bc93c1b..2128fae5687d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c >> @@ -2260,9 +2260,9 @@ intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> struct sdvo_device_mapping *mapping; >> >> if (sdvo->port == PORT_B) >> - mapping = &(dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[0]); >> + mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[0]; >> else >> - mapping = &(dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[1]); >> + mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[1]; >> >> if (mapping->initialized) >> sdvo->ddc_bus = 1 << ((mapping->ddc_pin & 0xf0) >> 4); >> @@ -2278,9 +2278,9 @@ intel_sdvo_select_i2c_bus(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> u8 pin; >> >> if (sdvo->port == PORT_B) >> - mapping = &dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[0]; >> + mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[0]; >> else >> - mapping = &dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[1]; >> + mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[1]; >> >> if (mapping->initialized && >> intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(dev_priv, mapping->i2c_pin)) >> @@ -2316,11 +2316,11 @@ intel_sdvo_get_slave_addr(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_sdvo *sdvo) >> struct sdvo_device_mapping *my_mapping, *other_mapping; >> >> if (sdvo->port == PORT_B) { >> - my_mapping = &dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[0]; >> - other_mapping = &dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[1]; >> + my_mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[0]; >> + other_mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[1]; >> } else { >> - my_mapping = &dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[1]; >> - other_mapping = &dev_priv->sdvo_mappings[0]; >> + my_mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[1]; >> + other_mapping = &dev_priv->vbt.sdvo_mappings[0]; >> } >> >> /* If the BIOS described our SDVO device, take advantage of it. */ >> -- >> 2.1.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx