On ke, 2016-03-23 at 14:57 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Doing a lot of work in the interrupt handler introduces huge
> latencies to the system as a whole.
>
> Most dramatic effect can be seen by running an all engine
> stress test like igt/gem_exec_nop/all where, when the kernel
> config is lean enough, the whole system can be brought into
> multi-second periods of complete non-interactivty. That can
> look for example like this:
>
> NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s!
> [kworker/u8:3:143]
> Modules linked in: [redacted for brevity]
> CPU: 0 PID: 143 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G U L 4.5.0-
> 160321+ #183
> Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client platform/WhiteTip
> Mountain 1
> Workqueue: i915 gen6_pm_rps_work [i915]
> task: ffff8800aae88000 ti: ffff8800aae90000 task.ti:
> ffff8800aae90000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8104a3c2>] [<ffffffff8104a3c2>]
> __do_softirq+0x72/0x1d0
> RSP: 0000:ffff88014f403f38 EFLAGS: 00000206
> RAX: ffff8800aae94000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000000006e0
> RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000004208060 RDI: 0000000000215d80
> RBP: ffff88014f403f80 R08: 0000000b1b42c180 R09: 0000000000000022
> R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 000000000000a030
> R13: 0000000000000082 R14: ffff8800aa4d0080 R15: 0000000000000082
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88014f400000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007fa53b90c000 CR3: 0000000001a0a000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Stack:
> 042080601b33869f ffff8800aae94000 00000000fffc2678 ffff88010000000a
> 0000000000000000 000000000000a030 0000000000005302 ffff8800aa4d0080
> 0000000000000206 ffff88014f403f90 ffffffff8104a716 ffff88014f403fa8
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> [<ffffffff8104a716>] irq_exit+0x86/0x90
> [<ffffffff81031e7d>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3d/0x50
> [<ffffffff814f3eac>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x7c/0x90
> <EOI>
> [<ffffffffa01c5b40>] ? gen8_write64+0x1a0/0x1a0 [i915]
> [<ffffffff814f2b39>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x9/0x20
> [<ffffffffa01c5c44>] gen8_write32+0x104/0x1a0 [i915]
> [<ffffffff8132c6a2>] ? n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x372/0xae0
> [<ffffffffa017cc9e>] gen6_set_rps_thresholds+0x1be/0x330 [i915]
> [<ffffffffa017eaf0>] gen6_set_rps+0x70/0x200 [i915]
> [<ffffffffa0185375>] intel_set_rps+0x25/0x30 [i915]
> [<ffffffffa01768fd>] gen6_pm_rps_work+0x10d/0x2e0 [i915]
> [<ffffffff81063852>] ? finish_task_switch+0x72/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff8105ab29>] process_one_work+0x139/0x350
> [<ffffffff8105b186>] worker_thread+0x126/0x490
> [<ffffffff8105b060>] ? rescuer_thread+0x320/0x320
> [<ffffffff8105fa64>] kthread+0xc4/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8105f9a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
> [<ffffffff814f351f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
> [<ffffffff8105f9a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
>
> I could not explain, or find a code path, which would explain
> a +20 second lockup, but from some instrumentation it was
> apparent the interrupts off proportion of time was between
> 10-25% under heavy load which is quite bad.
>
> By moving the GT interrupt handling to a tasklet in a most
> simple way, the problem above disappears completely.
>
> Also, gem_latency -n 100 shows 25% better throughput and CPU
> usage, and 14% better latencies.
>
> I did not find any gains or regressions with Synmark2 or
> GLbench under light testing. More benchmarking is certainly
> required.
>
> v2:
> * execlists_lock should be taken as spin_lock_bh when
> queuing work from userspace now. (Chris Wilson)
> * uncore.lock must be taken with spin_lock_irq when
> submitting requests since that now runs from either
> softirq or process context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
You also have to synchronize against the tasklet now whenever we
synchronize against the IRQ, see gen6_disable_rps_interrupts(),
gen8_irq_power_well_pre_disable() and
intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(). Not saying you should use a
threaded IRQ instead, but it does provide for this automatically.
--Imre
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++---------
> -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 8f3e3309c3ab..e68134347007 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
> if (iir & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << test_shift))
> notify_ring(engine);
> if (iir & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << test_shift))
> - intel_lrc_irq_handler(engine);
> + tasklet_schedule(&engine->irq_tasklet);
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 67592f8354d6..b3b62b3cd90d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -418,20 +418,18 @@ static void execlists_submit_requests(struct
> drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = rq0->i915;
>
> - /* BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled()); */
> -
> execlists_update_context(rq0);
>
> if (rq1)
> execlists_update_context(rq1);
>
> - spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>
> execlists_elsp_write(rq0, rq1);
>
> intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> }
>
> static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
> @@ -536,13 +534,14 @@ get_context_status(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv, u32 csb_base,
>
> /**
> * intel_lrc_irq_handler() - handle Context Switch interrupts
> - * @ring: Engine Command Streamer to handle.
> + * @engine: Engine Command Streamer to handle.
> *
> * Check the unread Context Status Buffers and manage the submission
> of new
> * contexts to the ELSP accordingly.
> */
> -void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
> {
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = (struct intel_engine_cs
> *)data;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->dev-
> >dev_private;
> u32 status_pointer;
> unsigned int read_pointer, write_pointer;
> @@ -551,7 +550,7 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
> unsigned int csb_read = 0, i;
> unsigned int submit_contexts = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> + spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>
> status_pointer =
> I915_READ_FW(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(engine));
> @@ -579,7 +578,7 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
> engine-
> >next_context_status_buffer << 8));
>
> intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> - spin_unlock(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>
> spin_lock(&engine->execlist_lock);
>
> @@ -621,7 +620,7 @@ static void execlists_context_queue(struct
> drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>
> i915_gem_request_reference(request);
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
> + spin_lock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(cursor, &engine->execlist_queue,
> execlist_link)
> if (++num_elements > 2)
> @@ -646,7 +645,7 @@ static void execlists_context_queue(struct
> drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> if (num_elements == 0)
> execlists_context_unqueue(engine);
>
> - spin_unlock_irq(&engine->execlist_lock);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&engine->execlist_lock);
> }
>
> static int logical_ring_invalidate_all_caches(struct
> drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> @@ -2016,6 +2015,8 @@ void intel_logical_ring_cleanup(struct
> intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (!intel_engine_initialized(engine))
> return;
>
> + tasklet_kill(&engine->irq_tasklet);
> +
> dev_priv = engine->dev->dev_private;
>
> if (engine->buffer) {
> @@ -2089,6 +2090,9 @@ logical_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->execlist_retired_req_list);
> spin_lock_init(&engine->execlist_lock);
>
> + tasklet_init(&engine->irq_tasklet, intel_lrc_irq_handler,
> + (unsigned long)engine);
> +
> logical_ring_init_platform_invariants(engine);
>
> ret = i915_cmd_parser_init_ring(engine);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> index 6690d93d603f..efcbd7bf9cc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ int intel_execlists_submission(struct
> i915_execbuffer_params *params,
> struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2
> *args,
> struct list_head *vmas);
>
> -void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> void intel_execlists_retire_requests(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine);
>
> #endif /* _INTEL_LRC_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 221a94627aab..29810cba8a8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> } semaphore;
>
> /* Execlists */
> + struct tasklet_struct irq_tasklet;
> spinlock_t execlist_lock;
> struct list_head execlist_queue;
> struct list_head execlist_retired_req_list;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
