On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:02:34PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:54:09PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > [ text/plain ] > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:00:22PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > >> Rename and document the GGTT init functions to give a better > > >> idea of the context where they are called from. > > >> > > >> i915_gem_gtt_init => i915_init_ggtt_hw > > > > > > Seems to me i915_ggtt_init_hw would match existing practices better. > > > > > > > There is also some gravity towards putting the verb first. In gem > > side atleast. > > At least in this case ggtt_init_hw would match ppgtt_init_hw, which > seems like a nice thing. It would also help with the plan to tag the init_hw phases consistently. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
