On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:19:35PM +0530, Goel, Akash wrote: > On 3/18/2016 4:02 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >The point about looping is to try and ensure that every possible code > >path is interrupted (since we only interrupt every 2us and the code paths > >tend to be shorter than than!). > > Thanks, will follow the gem_softpin.c example. > > I hope you meant 2ms here & not 2us, since the signal_helper_process > is sending signals at the ~500 Hz rate. Yeah, failed hopeless. Though I thought it was a 5000Hz rate. Any way the point is that the chance of a signal interrupting a critical path anywhere other than at a wait is small, and so we want to repeat the test a few times to increase our chances. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
