Re: [PATCH resend for CI 2/2] drm/i915: Use shorter route to dev_private where possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:04:10PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Where we have a request we can use req->i915 directly instead
> of going through the engine and device. Coccinelle script:
> 
> @@
> function f;
> identifier r;
> @@
> f(..., struct drm_i915_gem_request *r, ...)
> {
> ...
> - engine->dev->dev_private
> + r->i915
> ...
> }
> @@
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> @@
> (
>   req->
> - engine->dev->dev_private
> + i915
> )

struct intel_engine_cs *e;
- e->dev->dev_private
+ e->i915

Pretty please?

INTEL_INFO(engine->dev) (IS_GEN, HAS_ etc)
if r: INTEL_INFO(r->i915)
if e: INTEL_INFO(e->i915)
?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux