Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/03/2016 09:49, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 10/03/16 16:30, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==

Series: intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4303/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Series 4303v3 intel_engine_cs renaming bomb
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4303/revisions/3/mbox/

Test kms_flip:
         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE

Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787

         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bdw-ultra)
         Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)

Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349

Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
         Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
                 incomplete -> PASS       (hsw-gt2)
Test pm_rpm:
         Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
                 fail       -> DMESG-FAIL (snb-x220t)

Again unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349

                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-dellxps)
                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (hsw-brixbox)
         Subgroup basic-rte:
                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (snb-x220t)
                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (bsw-nuc-2)

bdw-nuci7        total:193  pass:181  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:12
bdw-ultra        total:193  pass:172  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:21
bsw-nuc-2        total:193  pass:156  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:37
byt-nuc          total:193  pass:158  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:35
hsw-brixbox      total:193  pass:170  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:22
hsw-gt2          total:193  pass:176  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:17
ilk-hp8440p      total:193  pass:129  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:63
ivb-t430s        total:193  pass:168  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:25
skl-i5k-2        total:193  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:23
skl-i7k-2        total:193  pass:170  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:23
skl-nuci5        total:161  pass:152  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
snb-dellxps      total:193  pass:158  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0
skip:34
snb-x220t        total:193  pass:159  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:0
skip:33

Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1565/

63461ba49f1bc63fe9dcccdbbaa3a5049c57ae37 drm-intel-nightly:
2016y-03m-10d-13h-21m-51s UTC integration manifest
434af94ce2882d30b6a179231e7e15de9c32f78c drm/i915: More renaming of
rings to engines
e21ab7713d974e6d1001ea13fab23c80aaa46500 drm/i915: More
intel_engine_cs renaming
f9c4ea7fc64c8a4a28c8315f908711e959261d95 drm/i915: Rename
intel_engine_cs struct members
c038a428c10d8f6976cd42b94371d8b97890945a drm/i915: Rename
intel_engine_cs function parameters
310c63e721cbc868fc15d831da6abb09be5de102 drm/i915: Rename local struct
intel_engine_cs variables

So looking good to merge.

Any objections wrt rebasing pain? John maybe? :) How exposed your patch
series are to code which deals a lot with intel_engine_cs?

It also affects engine reset patches but I tried to use engine where possible so hopefully won't be that bad, atleast we will have consistent naming throughout with this.

regard
Arun


Regards,

Tvrtko


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux