On 10/03/16 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:21:08PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:@@ -4952,14 +4952,14 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev) if (!i915.enable_execlists) { dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission; - dev_priv->gt.init_rings = i915_gem_init_rings; - dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_cleanup_ring_buffer; - dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_stop_ring_buffer; + dev_priv->gt.init_engines = i915_gem_init_engines; + dev_priv->gt.cleanup_engine = intel_cleanup_engine; + dev_priv->gt.stop_engine = intel_stop_engine; } else { dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = intel_execlists_submission; - dev_priv->gt.init_rings = intel_logical_rings_init; - dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_logical_ring_cleanup; - dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_logical_ring_stop; + dev_priv->gt.init_engines = intel_logical_rings_init; + dev_priv->gt.cleanup_engine = intel_logical_ring_cleanup; + dev_priv->gt.stop_engine = intel_logical_ring_stop;Making these changes manually or another patch?
Another *s*patch? No, this was manually. I was running out of steam with Coccinelle and 5/5 are just a few I've spotted and done by hand (or sed). Possibly I've missed some but the main body of churn is all here I think.
Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
