On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:34:26AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Some GT freq stuff > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4129/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > Series 4129v1 drm/i915: Some GT freq stuff > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4129/revisions/1/mbox/ > > Test kms_flip: > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE ilk underrun https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787 > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank: > fail -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > pass -> DMESG-FAIL (hsw-brixbox) (kms_flip:6763) DEBUG: name = flip last_ts = 333.745977 usec last_received_ts = 333.745522 usec last_seq = 1706 current_ts = 333.929216 usec current_received_ts = 333.929426 usec current_seq = 1716 count = 51 seq_step = 1 (kms_flip:6763) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:692: (kms_flip:6763) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((((double) diff.tv_usec) - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005 (kms_flip:6763) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device (kms_flip:6763) CRITICAL: inter-flip ts jitter: 0s, 183239usec **** END **** This sort of looks like the off by one error between the vbl timestamp and seq number https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 except here seq_step==1, so not sure why we ended up getting a difference of 11 frames (based on ts, 10 according to seq). I've seen this same thing before at least once before. > Subgroup basic-plain-flip: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-gt2) > Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking: > Subgroup basic: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-gt2) [ 333.891630] Device suspended during HW access [ 333.891668] [<ffffffffa03027ac>] hsw_write32+0x1dc/0x270 [i915] [ 333.891676] [<ffffffffa02ab9c8>] _ilk_disable_lp_wm+0x98/0xd0 [i915] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox) same [ 346.472879] [<ffffffffa03397eb>] hsw_write32+0x21b/0x270 [i915] [ 346.472888] [<ffffffffa02e29c8>] _ilk_disable_lp_wm+0x98/0xd0 [i915] > Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-gt2) > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i5k-2) > skip -> PASS (hsw-brixbox) > Test pm_rpm: > Subgroup basic-rte: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (snb-dellxps) same [ 306.449231] [<ffffffffa0329dec>] gen6_write32+0x1dc/0x270 [i915] [ 306.449244] [<ffffffffa02d39c8>] _ilk_disable_lp_wm+0x98/0xd0 [i915] > Test pm_rps: > Subgroup basic-api: > pass -> FAIL (skl-i5k-2) (pm_rps:6439) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function do_writeval, file pm_rps.c:136: (pm_rps:6439) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: readval(filp) == val (pm_rps:6439) CRITICAL: Last errno: 22, Invalid argument (pm_rps:6439) CRITICAL: error: 350 != 0 Hmm. This looks like the patches might have a problem. Need to investigate more. > > bdw-ultra total:183 pass:165 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 > bsw-nuc-2 total:183 pass:149 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 > byt-nuc total:183 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 > hsw-brixbox total:183 pass:162 dwarn:1 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:19 > hsw-gt2 total:183 pass:168 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14 > ilk-hp8440p total:183 pass:124 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:58 > ivb-t430s total:183 pass:162 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > skl-i5k-2 total:183 pass:162 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:20 > skl-i7k-2 total:183 pass:163 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 > snb-dellxps total:183 pass:152 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1530/ > > d369e0096716c6000139162b3b340f684f0a51da drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-03m-04d-17h-18m-08s UTC integration manifest > 7e3aa23d98537d012a1af05c5fef19b28ba71404 drm/i915: Drop locking/rpm resume/flush_delayed_work for cur/min/max freq sysfs read > d027c2e4920ffe7c0cf514c06327485376ef16ba drm/i915: Set GPU freq to idle_freq initially > 83be894eede637336015c43f661341c05f236681 drm/i915: Use GPLL ref clock to calculate GPU freqs on VLV/CHV -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
