On ma, 2016-02-29 at 19:57 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:11:02PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote: > > > > When binding pages for a partial view we should check that the offset + > > size is valid relative to the size of the gem object. > > > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c > > index 49e4f26..a477bb2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c > > @@ -3500,6 +3500,10 @@ intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view, > > struct sg_page_iter obj_sg_iter; > > int ret = -ENOMEM; > > > > + if (view->params.partial.offset + view->params.partial.size > > > + obj->pages->nents) > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > It seems to me that if we hit this, there must a bug somewhere higher > up. > Currently yes. This is in preparation of the more widespread support for partial views and was chosen as a good get-to-know-GEM-code candidate. Regards, Joonas > > > > + > > st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!st) > > goto err_st_alloc; > > -- > > 2.4.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
