On 24/02/16 13:54, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
When intel_update_watermarks is called on skylake it inspects
crtc->state, which should show as disabled. This wasn't the case,
and this resulted in a divide-by-zero in
skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits when intel_update_watermarks was called.
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 295 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:2834 skl_update_pipe_wm+0x102/0x8c0 [i915]()
WARN_ON(!config->num_pipes_active)
Modules linked in: coretemp i915(+) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CPU: 1 PID: 295 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G U W 4.5.0-rc4-xxxxxx #25
Hardware name: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0000000000000000 ffff88003777f5a8 ffffffff813485c2 ffff88003777f5f0
ffffffffa0236240 ffff88003777f5e0 ffffffff81050fce ffff8800aa420000
ffff8800aba18000 ffff8800aba18000 ffff880037304c00 ffff8800aa420000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff813485c2>] dump_stack+0x67/0x95
[<ffffffff81050fce>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9e/0xc0
[<ffffffff8105103c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
[<ffffffff8106945e>] ? flush_work+0x8e/0x280
[<ffffffff810693d5>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x280
[<ffffffffa016add2>] skl_update_pipe_wm+0x102/0x8c0 [i915]
[<ffffffffa016b96f>] skl_update_wm+0xff/0x5f0 [i915]
[<ffffffff810928ee>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x15e/0x1d0
[<ffffffff8109296d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffffa016ce6e>] intel_update_watermarks+0x1e/0x30 [i915]
[<ffffffffa01d3ee2>] intel_crtc_disable_noatomic+0xd2/0x150 [i915]
[<ffffffffa01dd3d2>] intel_modeset_setup_hw_state+0xdd2/0xde0 [i915]
[<ffffffffa01dfd83>] intel_modeset_init+0x15a3/0x1950 [i915]
[<ffffffffa02160b6>] i915_driver_load+0x13c6/0x1720 [i915]
[<ffffffff81522160>] ? add_sysfs_fw_map_entry+0x9b/0x9b
[<ffffffffa00b15ef>] drm_dev_register+0x6f/0xb0 [drm]
[<ffffffffa00b3b3a>] drm_get_pci_dev+0x10a/0x1d0 [drm]
[<ffffffffa01582d9>] i915_pci_probe+0x49/0x50 [i915]
[<ffffffff8138ae30>] pci_device_probe+0x80/0xf0
[<ffffffff8143e2ac>] driver_probe_device+0x1bc/0x3d0
[<ffffffff8143e526>] __driver_attach+0x66/0x90
[<ffffffff8143e4c0>] ? driver_probe_device+0x3d0/0x3d0
[<ffffffff8143be3b>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5b/0xa0
[<ffffffff8143db3e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff8143d461>] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x270
[<ffffffff8143eabc>] driver_register+0x8c/0xd0
[<ffffffff8138a2ed>] __pci_register_driver+0x5d/0x60
[<ffffffffa00b3c58>] drm_pci_init+0x58/0xf0 [drm]
[<ffffffff8109296d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffffa02aa000>] ? 0xffffffffa02aa000
[<ffffffffa02aa094>] i915_init+0x94/0x9b [i915]
[<ffffffff81000423>] do_one_initcall+0x113/0x1f0
[<ffffffff810a4b21>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x61/0x90
[<ffffffff811601dc>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cc/0x280
[<ffffffff8111110a>] do_init_module+0x60/0x1c8
[<ffffffff810c731b>] load_module+0x1ceb/0x2410
[<ffffffff810c3a60>] ? store_uevent+0x40/0x40
[<ffffffff811763d1>] ? kernel_read+0x41/0x60
[<ffffffff810c7c1d>] SYSC_finit_module+0x8d/0xa0
[<ffffffff810c7c4e>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff815f1e97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
---[ end trace 1149e9ab3695a423 ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for looking into this! Also,
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index deee56010eee..d9e0470419a1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6358,6 +6358,7 @@ static void i9xx_crtc_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
{
+ struct intel_encoder *encoder;
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
@@ -6378,6 +6379,19 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(crtc);
intel_crtc->active = false;
intel_fbc_disable(intel_crtc);
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d] hw state adjusted, was enabled, now disabled\n",
+ crtc->base.id);
+
+ WARN_ON(drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(crtc->state, NULL) < 0);
+ crtc->state->active = false;
+ crtc->enabled = false;
+ crtc->state->connector_mask = 0;
+ crtc->state->encoder_mask = 0;
+
+ for_each_encoder_on_crtc(crtc->dev, crtc, encoder)
+ encoder->base.crtc = NULL;
+
intel_update_watermarks(crtc);
intel_disable_shared_dpll(intel_crtc);
@@ -15526,38 +15540,9 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
/* Adjust the state of the output pipe according to whether we
* have active connectors/encoders. */
- if (!intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc))
+ if (crtc->active && !intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc))
intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(&crtc->base);
- if (crtc->active != crtc->base.state->active) {
- struct intel_encoder *encoder;
-
- /* This can happen either due to bugs in the get_hw_state
- * functions or because of calls to intel_crtc_disable_noatomic,
- * or because the pipe is force-enabled due to the
- * pipe A quirk. */
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d] hw state adjusted, was %s, now %s\n",
- crtc->base.base.id,
- crtc->base.state->enable ? "enabled" : "disabled",
- crtc->active ? "enabled" : "disabled");
-
- WARN_ON(drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(crtc->base.state, NULL) < 0);
- crtc->base.state->active = crtc->active;
- crtc->base.enabled = crtc->active;
- crtc->base.state->connector_mask = 0;
- crtc->base.state->encoder_mask = 0;
-
- /* Because we only establish the connector -> encoder ->
- * crtc links if something is active, this means the
- * crtc is now deactivated. Break the links. connector
- * -> encoder links are only establish when things are
- * actually up, hence no need to break them. */
- WARN_ON(crtc->active);
-
- for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &crtc->base, encoder)
- encoder->base.crtc = NULL;
- }
-
if (crtc->active || HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev)) {
/*
* We start out with underrun reporting disabled to avoid races.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
