Hey, Op 18-02-16 om 13:59 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:43:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:18:53PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>> Op 18-02-16 om 12:07 schreef Daniel Vetter: >>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:54:43AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>>>> Because encoder <-> connector mapping is fixed when not moving to >>>>> another crtc we can just reject connectors trying to steal an encoder >>>>> from a connector not part of the state. This won't break MST on i915 >>>>> because in that case connectors will be part of the state if you switch >>>>> them between crtc's. If they're not they stay on the same crtc, and >>>>> encoder stealing would have failed anyway. >>>> We must do this for backwards compat. setCrtc on a connector that needs an >>>> encoder already used on some other crtc is supposed to disable that >>>> encoder (and the entire pipe if it's all unused) if we need it. >>>> -Daniel >>>> >>> Could this be done from the setcrtc helper? Seems with atomic that wouldn't be desired behavior. >> If you want to avoid stealing with atomic, supply _all_ the >> connectors/crtcs when doing an atomic modeset. After all the point of >> atomic is to do global updates. I don't think it makes sense to have a >> special case just for setcrtc, since it makes compat/transition >> unecesserily complicated. > I disagree. Having properties change magically is just a bad idea IMO. > As far as checking for conflicts, IIRC I did that with a few bitmasks > in my original atomic code, and it was pretty trivial. The current > stealing code we have is way too complicated for what it does IMO. > >> And we do this kind of stealing in other places >> too with public api objects, e.g. if you move a plane. > Mm. What exactly do we steal with planes? I've sent a v2 that works nicely with "[IGT PATCH] tests/kms_setmode: Add tests when not stealing encoders on same crtc." For all other calls disabling connectors to steal its encoder is rejected, but the behavior is preserved for set_config only. ~Maarten _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx