On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:08:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Thanks for the patch, I pushed it to -dinq. > >> > >> The rule is, we should wait for the CI results before pushing. > > > > Yes, I forgot to wait for the result for this version of the patch, > > thanks for pointing it out. As a side-note the CI result still didn't > > show up, what to do in that case? Resend the patch after a day or so? > > Complain to Damien and/or Tomi. CI is/was down. Please don't push patches when that happens, but instead wait for things to stabilize again. Yes that slows things down, but otoh everytime CI is down we manage to sneak in an overlapping regression. And recovering from overlapping regressions makes everything even more painful than it already is. Yes, some kind of CI status dashboard is on the wishlist. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
