Re: [PATCH V5] drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:39:04PM -0800, abhay.kumar@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Abhay Kumar <abhay.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12)
> if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
> 
> v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
>     delay calculation(Ville).
> 
> v3: Addressed below comments
>     1. Tracking time from where last powercycle is initiated.
>     2. Used ktime_get_bootime() wrapper for boottime clock.
>     3. Used ktime_ms_delta() to get time difference.
> 
> v4: Updated v3 change log in detail.
> 
> v5: Removed static from panel_power_on_time(Stéphane).
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index e2bea710..29f21c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1811,12 +1811,21 @@ static void wait_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  static void wait_panel_power_cycle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> +	ktime_t panel_power_on_time;
> +	s64 panel_power_off_duration;
> +
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Wait for panel power cycle\n");
>  
> +	/* take the difference of currrent time and panel power off time
> +	 * and then make panel wait for t11_t12 if needed. */
> +	panel_power_on_time = ktime_get_boottime();
> +	panel_power_off_duration = ktime_ms_delta(panel_power_on_time, intel_dp->panel_power_off_time);
> +
>  	/* When we disable the VDD override bit last we have to do the manual
>  	 * wait. */
> -	wait_remaining_ms_from_jiffies(intel_dp->last_power_cycle,
> -				       intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay);
> +	if (panel_power_off_duration < (s64)intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay)
> +		wait_remaining_ms_from_jiffies(jiffies,
> +				       intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay - panel_power_off_duration);
>  
>  	wait_panel_status(intel_dp, IDLE_CYCLE_MASK, IDLE_CYCLE_VALUE);
>  }
> @@ -1968,7 +1977,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	I915_READ(pp_stat_reg), I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));
>  
>  	if ((pp & POWER_TARGET_ON) == 0)
> -		intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
> +		intel_dp->panel_power_off_time = ktime_get_boottime();
>  
>  	power_domain = intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
>  	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain);
> @@ -2117,7 +2126,7 @@ static void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	I915_WRITE(pp_ctrl_reg, pp);
>  	POSTING_READ(pp_ctrl_reg);
>  
> -	intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
> +	intel_dp->panel_power_off_time = ktime_get_boottime();
>  	wait_panel_off(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/* We got a reference when we enabled the VDD. */
> @@ -5116,7 +5125,7 @@ intel_dp_add_properties(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_connector *connect
>  
>  static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> -	intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
> +	intel_dp->panel_power_off_time = ktime_get_boottime();
>  	intel_dp->last_power_on = jiffies;
>  	intel_dp->last_backlight_off = jiffies;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index bc97012..137e40d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -770,9 +770,9 @@ struct intel_dp {
>  	int backlight_off_delay;
>  	struct delayed_work panel_vdd_work;
>  	bool want_panel_vdd;
> -	unsigned long last_power_cycle;
>  	unsigned long last_power_on;
>  	unsigned long last_backlight_off;
> +	ktime_t panel_power_off_time;
>  
>  	struct notifier_block edp_notifier;
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux