With large apertures we need to use uint64_t for counts and sizes. commit 0e2071411a4d4e1488a821daf522dffde2809e03 paved way for this but forgot to change the subtest parameters. v2: Pass correctly to the copy() also (Chris) References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93849 Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx> --- tests/gem_evict_alignment.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_evict_alignment.c b/tests/gem_evict_alignment.c index 6fa70f0cd0f9..3ce1bea9dec3 100644 --- a/tests/gem_evict_alignment.c +++ b/tests/gem_evict_alignment.c @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Run a couple of big batches to force the unbind on" #define WIDTH 1024 static void -copy(int fd, uint32_t dst, uint32_t src, uint32_t *all_bo, int n_bo, int alignment, int error) +copy(int fd, uint32_t dst, uint32_t src, uint32_t *all_bo, + uint64_t n_bo, uint64_t alignment, int error) { uint32_t batch[12]; struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc[2]; @@ -129,10 +130,11 @@ copy(int fd, uint32_t dst, uint32_t src, uint32_t *all_bo, int n_bo, int alignme free(obj); } -static void minor_evictions(int fd, int size, int count) +static void minor_evictions(int fd, uint64_t size, uint64_t count) { uint32_t *bo, *sel; - int n, m, alignment, pass, fail; + uint64_t n, m, alignment; + int pass, fail; intel_require_memory(2 * count, size, CHECK_RAM); @@ -159,9 +161,10 @@ static void minor_evictions(int fd, int size, int count) free(bo); } -static void major_evictions(int fd, int size, int count) +static void major_evictions(int fd, uint64_t size, uint64_t count) { - int n, m, loop, alignment, max; + uint64_t n, m, alignment, max; + int loop; uint32_t *bo; intel_require_memory(count, size, CHECK_RAM); -- 2.5.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
