Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/5] drm/i915: move VBT based LVDS presence check to intel_bios.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/5/2016 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
Hide knowledge about VBT child devices in intel_bios.c.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h   |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 53 +--------------------------------------
  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 715f200cfbf5..d70ef71d2538 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3398,6 +3398,7 @@ extern void intel_i2c_reset(struct drm_device *dev);
  int intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size);
  bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin);
/* intel_opregion.c */
  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
index 2800ae50465a..f3f4f8e687cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
@@ -1469,3 +1469,53 @@ bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return false;
  }
+
+/**
+ * intel_bios_is_lvds_present - is LVDS present in VBT
+ * @dev_priv:	i915 device instance
+ * @i2c_pin:	i2c pin for LVDS if present
+ *
+ * Return true if LVDS is present. If no child devices were parsed from VBT,
+ * assume LVDS is present.
+ */
+bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (!dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num)
+		return true;
+
we check if eDP is supported through following code before the call to
this function. please add this check here so we can avoid vbt referencing for that.

intel_lvds.c
 972         if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
 973                 if ((lvds & LVDS_DETECTED) == 0)
 974                         return;
 975                 if (dev_priv->vbt.edp_support) {
976 DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable LVDS for eDP support\n");
 977                         return;
 978                 }
 979         }

Sivakumar
+	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
+		union child_device_config *uchild = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
+		struct old_child_dev_config *child = &uchild->old;
+
+		/* If the device type is not LFP, continue.
+		 * We have to check both the new identifiers as well as the
+		 * old for compatibility with some BIOSes.
+		 */
+		if (child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_INT_LFP &&
+		    child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_LFP)
+			continue;
+
+		if (intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(dev_priv, child->i2c_pin))
+			*i2c_pin = child->i2c_pin;
+
+		/* However, we cannot trust the BIOS writers to populate
+		 * the VBT correctly.  Since LVDS requires additional
+		 * information from AIM blocks, a non-zero addin offset is
+		 * a good indicator that the LVDS is actually present.
+		 */
+		if (child->addin_offset)
+			return true;
+
+		/* But even then some BIOS writers perform some black magic
+		 * and instantiate the device without reference to any
+		 * additional data.  Trust that if the VBT was written into
+		 * the OpRegion then they have validated the LVDS's existence.
+		 */
+		if (dev_priv->opregion.vbt)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
index 0da0240caf81..80f8684e5137 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
@@ -772,57 +772,6 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_no_lvds[] = {
  	{ }	/* terminating entry */
  };
-/*
- * Enumerate the child dev array parsed from VBT to check whether
- * the LVDS is present.
- * If it is present, return 1.
- * If it is not present, return false.
- * If no child dev is parsed from VBT, it assumes that the LVDS is present.
- */
-static bool lvds_is_present_in_vbt(struct drm_device *dev,
-				   u8 *i2c_pin)
-{
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-	int i;
-
-	if (!dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num)
-		return true;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
-		union child_device_config *uchild = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
-		struct old_child_dev_config *child = &uchild->old;
-
-		/* If the device type is not LFP, continue.
-		 * We have to check both the new identifiers as well as the
-		 * old for compatibility with some BIOSes.
-		 */
-		if (child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_INT_LFP &&
-		    child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_LFP)
-			continue;
-
-		if (intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(dev_priv, child->i2c_pin))
-			*i2c_pin = child->i2c_pin;
-
-		/* However, we cannot trust the BIOS writers to populate
-		 * the VBT correctly.  Since LVDS requires additional
-		 * information from AIM blocks, a non-zero addin offset is
-		 * a good indicator that the LVDS is actually present.
-		 */
-		if (child->addin_offset)
-			return true;
-
-		/* But even then some BIOS writers perform some black magic
-		 * and instantiate the device without reference to any
-		 * additional data.  Trust that if the VBT was written into
-		 * the OpRegion then they have validated the LVDS's existence.
-		 */
-		if (dev_priv->opregion.vbt)
-			return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
-}
-
  static int intel_dual_link_lvds_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
  {
  	DRM_INFO("Forcing lvds to dual link mode on %s\n", id->ident);
@@ -979,7 +928,7 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
  	}
pin = GMBUS_PIN_PANEL;
-	if (!lvds_is_present_in_vbt(dev, &pin)) {
+	if (!intel_bios_is_lvds_present(dev_priv, &pin)) {
  		if ((lvds & LVDS_PORT_EN) == 0) {
  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LVDS is not present in VBT\n");
  			return;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux