On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:00:40PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 08:45 PM, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> >INTEL_SOC_PMIC is loading later than I915 failing the gpiod_get and
> >pwm_get calls in i915. Add a retry to give time for the INTEL_SOC_PMIC
> >to load. This was fine till now but broke in latest kernel. Maybe load
> >time for the INTEL_SOC_PMIC has increased.
> >
> >Since the lookup tables for GPIO (panel enable) and PWM both are
> >exported by same intel_soc_pmic driver, just retrying for the driver to
> >load in intel_dsi_init is sufficient. By the time we come to
> >setup_backlight, pwm would have been exported as well.
>
> Maybe we should play with initcalls here but I was not sure how it will
> impact if I change it for PMIC driver. IIRC, this discussion came up from
> Daniel at the time of original patches also but somehow did not close
> decidedly and has come back as a regression.
The correct way to handle this is to bail out with -EPROBE_DEFER. This is
how this is meant to be, no amount of random retrying will fix this
properly for such dynamic inter-module depencies.
And yes this is going to be a world-class test for our module load unwind
code.
-Daniel
> Regards
> Shobhit
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >index 91cef35..e309ef6 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> >@@ -1192,10 +1192,14 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > * Panel control.
> > */
> > if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->pwm_blc == PPS_BLC_PMIC) {
> >+ int retry = 4;
> >+ do {
> > intel_dsi->gpio_panel =
> > gpiod_get(dev->dev, "panel", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> >+ msleep(50);
> >+ } while (IS_ERR(intel_dsi->gpio_panel) && --retry);
> >
> >- if (IS_ERR(intel_dsi->gpio_panel)) {
> >+ if (!retry) {
> > DRM_ERROR("Failed to own gpio for panel control\n");
> > intel_dsi->gpio_panel = NULL;
> > }
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
