On 11/01/16 14:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:08:40PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
No need to call ktime_get_raw_ns twice per unlimited wait and can
also elimate a local variable.
But we could eliminate both, and the unsightly pointless assignment only
required to shut gcc up.
Still preferring my patch.
Ah I remember it now.. you were storing it in the pointer provided by
the caller. I think that is significantly worse, sorry cannot approve that.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
