On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:29:48AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Engine initialization would have failed if those two weren't > pinned and calling i915_gem_obj_is_pinned is illegal from irq > context without the big lock held. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > index ffe004de22b0..5b3795815d8e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > @@ -350,8 +350,6 @@ static int execlists_update_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq) > uint32_t *reg_state; > > BUG_ON(!ctx_obj); > - WARN_ON(!i915_gem_obj_is_pinned(ctx_obj)); > - WARN_ON(!i915_gem_obj_is_pinned(rb_obj)); > > page = i915_gem_object_get_dirty_page(ctx_obj, LRC_STATE_PN); > reg_state = kmap_atomic(page); > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
