On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:29:45AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> No need to call ktime_get_raw_ns twice per unlimited wait and can
> also elimate a local variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index de98dc41fb9f..c4f69579eb7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> int state = interruptible ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> unsigned long timeout_expire;
> - s64 before, now;
> + s64 before = 0;
Is gcc really this dense? Should be easy for it to spot that both branches
depend upon the same condition. Please remove that assignment. With that
changed:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> int ret;
>
> WARN(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv), "IRQs disabled");
> @@ -1266,14 +1266,17 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> return -ETIME;
>
> timeout_expire = jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(*timeout);
> +
> + /*
> + * Record current time in case interrupted by signal, or wedged.
> + */
> + before = ktime_get_raw_ns();
> }
>
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6)
> gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv, rps, req->emitted_jiffies);
>
> - /* Record current time in case interrupted by signal, or wedged */
> trace_i915_gem_request_wait_begin(req);
> - before = ktime_get_raw_ns();
>
> /* Optimistic spin for the next jiffie before touching IRQs */
> ret = __i915_spin_request(req, state);
> @@ -1331,11 +1334,10 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> finish_wait(&ring->irq_queue, &wait);
>
> out:
> - now = ktime_get_raw_ns();
> trace_i915_gem_request_wait_end(req);
>
> if (timeout) {
> - s64 tres = *timeout - (now - before);
> + s64 tres = *timeout - (ktime_get_raw_ns() - before);
>
> *timeout = tres < 0 ? 0 : tres;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
