Re: [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Convert requests to use struct fence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/08/2016 01:47 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:16:54PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On 01/04/2016 12:57 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:20:44AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>> So this one has my ack.
>>>
>>> This series makes a number of fundamental mistakes in seqno-interrupt
>>> handling, so no.
>>
>> Well unless you can enumerate the issues in enough detail for us to address them, we don't have much choice but to go ahead.  I know you've replied to a few of these threads in the past, but I don't see a current list of outstanding bugs aside from the one about modifying input params on the execbuf error path (though the code comment seems to indicate some care is being taken there at least, so should be a small fix).
> 
> Other than the series addressing the reported bugs which this is direct
> conflict with?

Which patchset came first?  And yes, clearly enumerating the issues is
helpful regardless.  It doesn't really matter which came first though,
we've agreed to move forward with John's version since the scheduler has
been outstanding for so long, so your bug fixes will have to be rebased
on top of this work.  I hope that's acceptable, since I think we all
have the same ultimate goal here...

Jesse
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux