> commit ac9b8236551d1177fd07b56aef9b565d1864420d
> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Nov 27 18:55:26 2015 +0200
>
> drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain
>
> gmbus also needs the power domain infrastructure right from the start,
> since as soon as we register the i2c controllers someone can use them.
>
> v2: Adjust cleanup paths too (Chris).
>
> v3: Rebase onto -nightly (totally bogus tree I had lying around) and
> also move dpio init head (Ville).
>
> v4: Ville instead suggested to move gmbus setup later in the sequence,
> since it's only needed by the modeset code.
>
> v5: Move even close to the actual user, right next to the comment that
> states where we really need gmbus (and interrupts!).
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: ac9b8236551d ("drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> References: http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg83075.html
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Meelis, can you pls retest this one?
I also confirmed that my 865G chipset computer was suffering from the
same problem and the patch also helps on D865GLC mainboard with my
userspace that autoloads eeprom driver.
--
Meelis Roos (mroos@xxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
