Unlike the handle, the name table uses a sleeping mutex rather than a spinlock. The allocation is in a normal context, and we can use the simpler sleeping gfp_t, rather than have to take from the atomic reserves. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c index ad955d7c99fd..1b0c2c127072 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c @@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -ENOENT; mutex_lock(&dev->object_name_lock); - idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL); /* prevent races with concurrent gem_close. */ if (obj->handle_count == 0) { ret = -ENOENT; @@ -650,7 +649,7 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, } if (!obj->name) { - ret = idr_alloc(&dev->object_name_idr, obj, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT); + ret = idr_alloc(&dev->object_name_idr, obj, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL); if (ret < 0) goto err; @@ -661,7 +660,6 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, ret = 0; err: - idr_preload_end(); mutex_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock); drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj); return ret; -- 2.6.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx