Re: Why idle_freq is set to RPn and not RPe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/30/2015 4:20 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 04:09:46PM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote:
    Turbo frequency range is Rpe to Rp0 when GPU is active as, on workload
    submission frequency is taken to Rpe.

    Does the HW require us to drop to RPn before entering RC6?
    If we can enter RC6 even with other frequencies I think we can keep
    running at Rpe on Idle.
Remember that we quite frequently prevent the hardware going into RC6,
I assume this is threshold times in TO/EI mode for which GT is idle but not power gated.
and that it has been known for the hardware to fail to enter RC6 itself
(through driver error or whatnot).
And assume this is because of forcewake/rc6 setup errors in driver paths which should not happen in best case :)
Agree that running at Rpn makes sense.
  Going to the extreme, why wouldn't
you set Rp0 on idle, since that will give the best restart latency?
True. We can have different logic that starts from Rp0 and comes down if perf is met.
-Chris

Thanks for the inputs Chris.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux