On to, 2015-12-17 at 21:02 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:25:49PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Add i915.debug parameter to control output in cases where the debug > > output > > amount will be massive and as such is unsuitable for everyday use, > > but still > > significant in value when solving bugs. > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Maybe i915.verbose_checks ? > > Too similar to i915.verbose_state_checks though? > > Just trying to differentiate from drm.debug which we will also be > settings. As discussed in IRC, I will go with WARN_RECUR and i915.warn_recurring, those can potentially be pushed upstream all the way to kernel core. Regards, Joonas > -Chris > -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
