On ke, 2015-12-16 at 11:07 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > On ti, 2015-12-15 at 20:10 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > > v2-v3: > > > - unchanged > > > v4: > > > - keep the corresponding check in the get helper (Chris) > > > > This is put helper you patched, so I think the above message is > > incorrect. > > It is referring to a chunk no longer in the patch. :) Yes, in v1 I removed an assert from intel_runtime_pm_get(), which was reinstated in v4: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-November/080048.html > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
