On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:26:06PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sharma@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > +static int > +stolen_evict(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u64 size) > { > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; > - struct drm_mm_node *stolen; > - int ret; > + struct list_head unwind, evict; > + struct i915_stolen_node *iter; > + int ret, active; lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex); would be nice as I just spent a moment refreshing what locks we required. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx