On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:20:43PM +0100, Michał Winiarski wrote: > According to bspec, some parts of HW expect the addresses to be in > a canonical form, where bits [63:48] == [47]. Let's convert addresses to > canonical form prior to relocating and return converted offsets to > userspace. > > v2: Whitespace fixup, gen8_canonical_addr description (Chris, Ville) What's the impact? The bspec says "assumes" but not required? Does anything truly break otherwise? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
