On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:27:59PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:46:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > + * mus ensure that drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset() has been called > > + * beforehand. > > Perhaps mention that the default drm_atomic_helper_check() > implementation calls them in the right order? Good idea, added a sentence with reference to drm_atomic_helper_check(). > > > + * > > + * When using drm_atomic_helper_check_planes CRTC's ->atomic_check() > > Parentheses after the function name? Also, technically I think it would > need to be "CRTCs'" since it relates to multiple CRTCs. Perhaps just > leaving out the 's would work as well. I went with CRTCs'. > > void (*atomic_begin)(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state); > > + /** > > + * @atomic_flush: > > + * > > + * Drivers should prepare for an atomic update of multiple planes on > > + * a CRTC in this hook. Depending upon hardware this might include > > The first sentence here is the exact same as for ->atomic_begin(), but > it clearly has a different purpose. Perhaps: > > "Drivers should finalize an atomic update of multiple planes on > a CRTC in this hook. ..." > > ? Sounds good, simply forgotten to update that part. All other suggestions applied, thanks a lot for all your careful comments. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
