On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:20:15 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:15:59 +0100,
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:54:32 +0100,
> > > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/i915_component.h b/include/drm/i915_component.h
> > > > > index 30d89e0da2c6..058d39e8d57f 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/drm/i915_component.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/drm/i915_component.h
> > > > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> > > > > * @codec_wake_override: Enable/Disable generating the codec wake signal
> > > > > * @get_cdclk_freq: get the Core Display Clock in KHz
> > > > > * @sync_audio_rate: set n/cts based on the sample rate
> > > > > + * @get_eld: fill the audio state and ELD bytes for the given port
> > > >
> > > > One more: You seem to still be on an old baseline, with switched to the
> > > > new in-line comment layout. That allows you to spec the callback semantics
> > > > in much more detail since it allows real paragraphs.
> > >
> > > Yes, I've been waiting for your (or Dave's) answer to my previous
> > > question: which branch can I use as a solid base?
> >
> > Ooops sorry. drm-next is now open and has everything you need.
> >
> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
>
> Thanks, I'll rebase on it.
Hmm, this branch gives a compile warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:5217:0: warning: "for_each_power_domain" redefined
#define for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) \
^
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:32:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:36:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:312:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
#define for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) \
^
LD [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.o
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
