On 30/11/15 10:06, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 29/11/15 08:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
Limit busywaiting only to the request currently being processed by the
GPU. If the request is not currently being processed by the GPU, there
is a very low likelihood of it being completed within the 2 microsecond
spin timeout and so we will just be wasting CPU cycles.
v2: Check for logical inversion when rebasing - we were incorrectly
checking for this request being active, and instead busywaiting for
when the GPU was not yet processing the request of interest.
v3: Try another colour for the seqno names.
v4: Another colour for the function names.
Adding a field in the request to track the sequence number of the
previous request isn't ideal when considering the scheduler and
preemption. But we've got a separate batch-in-progress sequence number
in the hardware status page (also for use by TDR to check which batch is
currently running), so you could use that. Then the check is simply
curr = intel_read_status_page(ring, I915_BATCH_ACTIVE_SEQNO);
if (curr != req->seqno)
return -EAGAIN;
.DAve.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx