On Tue, 01 Dec 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:29:26PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Choose between i2c bit banging and gmbus in a new higher level function,
>> and let the i2c core retry the first time we fall back to bit banging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
>> index ccb522c176bd..e26e22a72e3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
>> @@ -472,9 +472,7 @@ gmbus_xfer_index_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct i2c_msg *msgs)
>> }
>>
>> static int
>> -gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
>> - struct i2c_msg *msgs,
>> - int num)
>> +do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
>> {
>> struct intel_gmbus *bus = container_of(adapter,
>> struct intel_gmbus,
>> @@ -483,14 +481,6 @@ gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
>> int i = 0, inc, try = 0;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS);
>> - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
>> -
>> - if (bus->force_bit) {
>> - ret = i2c_bit_algo.master_xfer(adapter, msgs, num);
>> - goto out;
>> - }
>> -
>> retry:
>> I915_WRITE(GMBUS0, bus->reg0);
>>
>> @@ -585,13 +575,34 @@ timeout:
>> bus->adapter.name, bus->reg0 & 0xff);
>> I915_WRITE(GMBUS0, 0);
>>
>> - /* Hardware may not support GMBUS over these pins? Try GPIO bitbanging instead. */
>> + /*
>> + * Hardware may not support GMBUS over these pins? Try GPIO bitbanging
>> + * instead. Use EAGAIN to have i2c core retry.
>> + */
>> bus->force_bit = 1;
>> - ret = i2c_bit_algo.master_xfer(adapter, msgs, num);
>> + ret = -EAGAIN;
>
> This does mean we're left to the mercy of the timeout handling in the
> i2c core. That is if our gmbus attempt takes too long, we may never
> get a chance to retry with bit banging. Not sure if that's a real
> concern or not.
IIUC the longest it can take to transfer 4 bytes without timing out is
just under 50 ms. The i2c core use a default timeout of 1000 ms. So if
we first succesfully, but slowly manage to transfer quite a bit (well,
at least 80 bytes, almost but not quite timing out), and then time out,
i2c core won't try again.
I do not think this is a real concern, but if it is, we can increase the
adapter->timeout in our gmbus setup code.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Otherwise lgtm.
>
>>
>> out:
>> - mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_gmbus *bus = container_of(adapter, struct intel_gmbus,
>> + adapter);
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = bus->dev_priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS);
>> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
>> +
>> + if (bus->force_bit)
>> + ret = i2c_bit_algo.master_xfer(adapter, msgs, num);
>> + else
>> + ret = do_gmbus_xfer(adapter, msgs, num);
>>
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
>> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS);
>>
>> return ret;
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
