On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:18:43PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:53:07PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > We decay hangcheck score, instead of setting it to zero, > > when seqno moves forward. This was added as mechanism to > > detect batches full of invalid waits. > > And slow DoS. So no. Yeah we need to fix the deqp CI issues with tunables. Running a shader for 10s and monopolizing the gpu might be ok in a stress tests, but it's definitely not ok by default on a normal system. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
