On 29/11/15 08:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
We have relied upon the sole caller (wait_ioctl) validating the timeout argument. However, when waiting for multiple requests I forgot to ensure that the timeout was still positive on the later requests. This is more simply done inside __i915_wait_request.
As discussed on IRC please mention that the extra jiffie happens because nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout adds it. Otherwise it is not immediately clear why would it wait an extra one since __i915_wait_request has explicit code to ensure timeout does not go negative already.
With that clarified, Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Regards, Tvrtko
Fixes a minor regression introduced in commit b47161858ba13c9c7e03333132230d66e008dd55 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Apr 27 13:41:17 2015 +0100 drm/i915: Implement inter-engine read-read optimisations where we may end up waiting for an extra jiffie for each active ring after consuming all of the user's timeout. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index f33c35c6130f..65d101b47d8e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -1251,8 +1251,16 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true)) return 0; - timeout_expire = timeout ? - jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout((u64)*timeout) : 0; + timeout_expire = 0; + if (timeout) { + if (WARN_ON(*timeout < 0)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (*timeout == 0) + return -ETIME; + + timeout_expire = jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(*timeout); + } if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6) gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv, rps, req->emitted_jiffies);
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx